We are the SocialistSleepover

Introduce Yourself
#1

thanks for letting us crash here, guys.

#2

it's like internet homesteading.  Find a piece of property and just set up shop.  It's wonderful!

#3

[quote author=SocialistSleepover link=topic=2004.msg22696#msg22696 date=1258771570]
thanks for letting us crash here, guys.
[/quote]

Welcome.  Who is "we"?

#4

[quote author=FTL_Ian link=topic=2004.msg22714#msg22714 date=1258773543]
[quote author=SocialistSleepover link=topic=2004.msg22696#msg22696 date=1258771570]
thanks for letting us crash here, guys.
[/quote]

Welcome.  Who is "we"?
[/quote]

I'm wondering this myself.

#5

We are the Borg. Lower your firewalls and surrender your servers. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile.

#6

[quote author=FTL_Ian link=topic=2004.msg22714#msg22714 date=1258773543]
[quote author=SocialistSleepover link=topic=2004.msg22696#msg22696 date=1258771570]
thanks for letting us crash here, guys.
[/quote]

Welcome.  Who is "we"?
[/quote]

Like we noted earlier, we would prefer to be anonymous, but we stand for liberty, equality, and solidarity.

#7

How many do you claim to represent? 

#8

i think this is used as a term of… proof of insanity?  or maybe it's conjoined twins!!!  cool!

#9

which, if true, would be a rude statement?

#10

[quote author=antijingoist link=topic=2004.msg22792#msg22792 date=1258780601]
which, if true, would be a rude statement?
[/quote]

which is why i didn't say siamese twins.  that wouldn't be "politically correct" :wink:

#11

you are such an anarchist. :stuck_out_tongue:

#12

Maybe it’s the royal we.

There are three kinds of people entitled to use we: Pregnant women, monarchs, and schizophrenics. So which are you? ;D

#13

it might be Ben Affleck, he's all for socialism.

#14

We are several former "Anarcho"-Capitalists, Objectivists, and Minarchists working in tandem to expose the fallacies that prevail in the ideology that many of you present in order to form a more rational shape of libertarianism.

When we post, we are all speaking by consensus.

#15

[quote author=SocialistSleepover link=topic=2004.msg22882#msg22882 date=1258831516]
We are several former "Anarcho"-Capitalists, Objectivists, and Minarchists working in tandem to expose the fallacies that prevail in the ideology that many of you present in order to form a more rational shape of libertarianism.

When we post, we are all speaking by consensus.
[/quote]

So there are at least four of you?  So are you all on the same commune there on the college campus, or are you all voting on what posts are appropriate to post under your communal account?

#16

[quote author=FTL_Ian link=topic=2004.msg22883#msg22883 date=1258832447]
[quote author=SocialistSleepover link=topic=2004.msg22882#msg22882 date=1258831516]
We are several former "Anarcho"-Capitalists, Objectivists, and Minarchists working in tandem to expose the fallacies that prevail in the ideology that many of you present in order to form a more rational shape of libertarianism.

When we post, we are all speaking by consensus.
[/quote]

So there are at least four of you?  So are you all on the same commune there on the college campus, or are you all voting on what posts are appropriate to post under your communal account?
[/quote]

Can "we" not afford an account for each individual in "we"? Doesnt "we" realize that all this "we" bullshit just makes "we" sound like the Borg?

#17

maybe the borg are socialists.

#18

Welcome to the forums! 

#19

Welcome!

#20

I'm sure this is gonna end well.

Greetings though. Hope ya play nice.