There are supreme court decisions in regard to travelling which identify traveling (non-commercial) as a right guaranteeing the right to travel. So when there is a conflict in court over a federal right then the state RSA’s take a back seat. So the federal definitions are applicable including Black’s Law.
I also read that the best defense is to avoid giving the court jurisdiction in the first place. You are a natural person as a human and the court is an artificial person created by man so you are above the created by man creature.
THe right to travel was in the Magna Carta one of the foundations of our law. It is also mentioned in the Articles of Confederation which were never abolished.
see TEA2.net